期刊论文

中文

中国临床心理学杂志

1005-3611

2017

25

3

453-456

10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.03.012

国家自然科学基金(81370034)

本校为其他机构

目的:比较大五人格量表(NEO Personality Inventory Revised,NEO-PI-R)神经质分量表(全式)和大五人格量表简版(NEO Five Factor Inventory,NEO-FFI)神经质分量表(简式)的信效度,并分别考察其跨性别测量等值性。方法:共有5352名在校大学生完成了神经质分量表全式和简式,以及流调中心用抑郁量表。考察量表的内部一致性,并采用Amos软件进行验证性因素分析以考察量表的构想效度和跨性别测量等值性。结果:神经质分量表全式的信度(Cronbach’s α= 0.92,M_(IC)=0.20)以及效度指标(GFI=0.93,CFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.056)均达到标准,并且在男女群组上严格等值(△CFI0.01)。结论:神经质分量表全式和简式均具有良...

Objective: To compare the reliability and validity of the neuroticism subscale of the NEO Personality Inventory Revised(NEO-PI-R) with the neuroticism subscale of the NEO Five Factor Inventory(NEO-FFI), and examine their measurement equivalence across gender. Methods: A total of 5352 undergraduates completed the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-PI-R, the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-FFI and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and mean inter-item correlation(M_(IC)) were calculated to ...